Skip to content

anti-coordination

Fresh

Source: BIBLE.md (Phase 12 Phase 4, anti-coordination 4 routes), ROADMAP.md (Phase 4.2)

Network graph that tracks which accounts exist on which platforms and ensures they NEVER interact, never share IPs, never overlap in timing.

Not just randomization. Deliberate anti-correlation. If Account A and Account B are both on Twitter, they never follow each other, never engage with the same content on the same day, never use the same proxy.

What it detects

flowchart LR
  A[Account A] --> P1[Proxy 1.2.3.4]
  B[Account B] --> P1
  P1 --> CN[CONFLICT: shared proxy]
  C[Account C] --> T[Twitter @somepost at 12:01]
  D[Account D] --> T
  T --> CT[CONFLICT: shared content engagement]

Conflict types:

  • Shared proxy across accounts
  • Same content engaged within a window (likes, comments, follows)
  • Timing overlap on the same platform within a window
  • Mutual follow/connect

Routes (4)

MethodRouteWhat
GET/anti-coordination/graphFull network graph
GET/anti-coordination/conflictsDetected conflicts
POST/anti-coordination/checkPre-flight check before action
POST/anti-coordination/resolveAuto-resolve a conflict

Pre-flight check

Before any action:

bash
curl -X POST http://localhost:4700/anti-coordination/check \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "accountId": "abc123",
    "platform": "twitter",
    "action": "like",
    "target": "tweet-id-456"
  }'

Returns:

json
{
  "safe": false,
  "conflict": {
    "type": "shared-content",
    "withAccount": "def789",
    "engagedAt": "2026-05-20T11:59:00Z",
    "windowMinutes": 60
  },
  "recommendation": "delay-or-skip"
}